• CRISPR-Cas9 Humanized Knockin
    Mouse Models
    • AAALAC and worldwide shipping
    CRISPR-Cas9 Humanized Knockin <br/>Mouse Models

CRISPR Mice Generation Service

Applied StemCell utilizes its in-licensed CRISPR/Cas9 technology to generate mouse models with precise gene modifications such as knockout, knock-in and point mutation models for a variety of research and preclinical applications. 

Learn more about our CRISPR Mouse Model Generation Service.

  • Most up-to-date CRISPR design strategies and protocols
  • 100% target-site cutting efficiency using validated gRNA
  • >99% success rate in generating final mouse model
  • Wide variety of genome modifications available
  • F1 breeding to confirm germline transmission
  • Animal IP belongs to researchers
  • Electrophysiology and behavioral assessments for your custom mouse models
What is the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9 technology as compared to TARGATT™ and random transgenesis?
How many embryos are microinjected for validation of gRNAs?
What is the correlation between cutting in the embryo test (in vivo gRNA validation) and the final mouse?
Which technology is suitable for inserting a gene of interest with GFP or Cre-ERT?
Products and Services
Application Notes

Factors affecting genome editing in mouse models using CRISPR/Cas9

Three major factors influence the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 in mouse models: the concentrations of Cas9 mRNA,  gRNA and donor DNA. Each of these factors are interdependent which in turn affects three other intedependent parameters: the nuclease-mediated cutting rate, gene modification efficiency and birth rate of the pups.

crispr mice poster 1

Increasing gRNA and Cas9 concentration improves cutting/editing efficiency but affects birth rate

With increasing gRNA and Cas9 mRNA concentrations, the cutting efficiency increases to almost 97% but birth rate decreases. Therefore, a balance between gRNA and Cas9 concentrations, and birth rate of mice is required for maintaining a reasonable number of embryos microinjected and in turn to optimize birthrate and number of founders born.

crispr mice poster 2

Optimal donor concentration is also necessary to maintain balance between gene editing efficiency and birth rate

With increasing donor DNA concentration, the gene editing efficiency of CRISPR system increases but birth rate decreases. An optimal donor concentration of 200 ng/µl is recommended for microinjection in mouse embryos.

crispr mice poster 3

Gene editing efficiency and birth rate is also affected by size of insert and length of the homologous regions when using single stranded oligo donor DNA

A technical limitation of ssODN is its length. Most commercial vendors can manufacture up to 200 bases of single stranded DNA molecule. Therefore, homologous regions for a ssODN can be shortenend if insert size gets bigger. The system is perfect for point mutation insertions and can accomodate small fragment inserts up to 100 bp.

crispr mice poster 4

Distance between 2 cutting sites must be > 3kb

In projects necessitating 2 modification sites such as generating a conditional knock-out model with 2 LoxP inserts, the distance between cutting sites should be atleast 3 kb for simultaneous modification to avoid deletions between the two cut sites due to efficient NHEJ repair. If the distance between sites is < 3 kb, sequential modification is recommended. The recommended distance between the two insertion sites should be > 6 kb for efficient simultaneous modifications and to limit undesired deletion events.

crispr mice poster 5

Summary of our technical discussion about CRISPR gene modification in mouse models

  • Optimal conditions are necessary for high efficiency generating mouse models
  • Cas9/gRNA/donor DNA concentration; insert size and homology arm length are crucial for balancing cutting rate, gene editing efficiency and birth rate
  • The optimal distance between two cutting sites for simultaneous modification is >6 kb
Technical Details

crispr mice diagram

Our affordable Mouse Model Service uses upgraded CRISPR/ Cas9 design strategies, highly optimized CRISPR protocols and validation methods to generate mouse models successfully with a fast turnaround and reduced cost. We have generated > 500 mouse models with very high efficiency and success rate.

Some examples of available genetic modifications in mice include but not limited to:

  • Constitutive and conditional knockouts
  • Small fragment insertions, point mutations
  • Large fragment knock-in: locus specific or safe harbor locus
  • Gene tagging/ reporter gene insertion
  • Gene replacement, humanized models
  • Gene fusion/ translocation
  • Gene overexpression, inducible expression, promoter modifications
  • Gene editing/ correction to model human diseases

Leverage our extensive scientific expertise in CRISPR/Cas9 and other complementary genome editing technologies such as our proprietary TARGATT™ site-specific knock-in technology and traditional homologous recombination methods in generating a mouse model specific unique to your research niche.




1. Targeting DNA Vector Creation

gRNA Design and Construction (2-4 gRNAs)
gRNA in vitro Functional Validation (2-4 gRNAs)
Donor DNA Construction
In vitro Trabscription and QC for Microinjection

2-4 weeks
2-3 weeks
2-6 weeks
1 week

A Report on Cloning and Validation

2. CRISPR DNA Pronuclear Microinjection

1-2 months


3. Animal Care, Housing and Genotyping

Pups generated and genotyping showing the proof of precise gene insertion

2-3 months

At least 1 Founder
A final report on the project including the original targeting strategy and microinjection detail

Inquire about our CRISPR Mouse Model Generation Service: Knockout, Knock-in, Point Mutation

Case Studies

Case Study# 1: CRISPR Knock-in Model - Generation of site-specific 2 kb large fragment knock-in mouse using CRISPR/Cas9

Goal: To insert a 2 kb large fragment DNA (gene of interest) at “a specified locus” in the mouse genome using CRISPR/Cas9.

The project was designed using a well optimized protocol to generate the transgenic mice: (1) Cas9 mRNA and gRNA were produced by in vitro transcription; (2) donor vector was constructed by in-fusion method: the plasmid contained 1 kb long 5’ and 1 kb long 3’ homologous arms flanking the gene of interest (2kb); (3) the mixture of Cas9 mRNA, gRNA and donor vector was microinjected into fertilized eggs of C57BL/6j mouse background.

Using a panel of genotyping primer pairs, three out of 31 pups born after microinjection (#15, 19, and 26) were identified as founders (F0), with the gene of interest inserted at the desired locus. 

crispr mice knock-in model case study 1

Figure 1: Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR results in F0 mice (#15, 19, and 26) with site-specific gene knock-in. The left part of the gel shows the 5’ junction fragment (2,191 bp), and the right part of the gel shows the 3’ junction fragment (2,557 bp). [wt: wildtype control; M: 1 kb DNA ladder].

Case Study# 2: CRISPR Knock-in Model - Site-specific knock-in of a 27 bp tag in mice using CRISPR/Cas9

crispr mice knock-in model case study 4

Figure: Five (#2, 5, 6 13 and 17) out of nineteen pups, 26%, were genotyped by restriction enzyme digest and sequencing to confirm the correct knock-in on one of the alleles (heterozygotes). A sequence with desired knock-in generated a different cutting pattern compared to its wild type counterpart.


CRISPR Mouse/ Rat Models:  Knock-in, Knockout, and Conditional Knockout 

CRISPR Technology

CRISPR Knock-in H11 Locus in Pigs

  • Ruan, J., Li, H., Xu, K., Wu, T., Wei, J., Zhou, R., ... & Chen-Tsai, R. Y. (2015). Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated transgene knockin at the H11 locus in pigs. Scientific reports, 5, 14253.

Knock-in, Knockout, Conditional Knock-out

  • Park, J., Jung, E., Lee, S. H., & Chung, W. S. (2020). CDC50A dependent phosphatidylserine exposure induces inhibitory post-synapse elimination by microglia. bioRxiv.
  • Ramachandra Rao, S., Fliesler, S. J., Kotla, P., Nguyen, M. N., & Pittler, S. J. (2020). Lack of Overt Retinal Degeneration in a K42E Dhdds Knock-In Mouse Model of RP59. Cells9(4), 896.
  • Beurg, M., Barlow, A., Furness, D. N., & Fettiplace, R. (2019). A Tmc1 mutation reduces calcium permeability and expression of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in cochlear hair cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(41), 20743-20749.
  • Goldring, A. C., Beurg, M., & Fettiplace, R. (2019). The contribution of TMC1 to adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in cochlear outer hair cells. The Journal of physiology.
  • Hwang, S., He, Y., Xiang, X., Seo, W., Kim, S. J., Ma, J., ... & Kunos, G. (2019). Interleukin‐22 ameliorates neutrophil‐driven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis through multiple targets. Hepatology https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31031.
  • Dumesic, P. A., Egan, D. F., Gut, P., Tran, M. T., Parisi, A., Chatterjee, N., ... & Dou, F. (2019). An Evolutionarily Conserved uORF Regulates PGC1α and Oxidative Metabolism in Mice, Flies, and Bluefin Tuna. Cell metabolism.
  • Liang, T., Zhang, H., Xu, Q., Wang, S., Qin, C., & Lu, Y. (2019). Mutant Dentin Sialophosphoprotein Causes Dentinogenesis Imperfecta. Journal of dental research, 0022034519854029.
  • Qian, W., Miner, C. A., Ingle, H., Platt, D. J., Baldridge, M. T., & Miner, J. J. (2019). A human STAT1 gain-of-function mutation impairs CD8+ T cell responses against gammaherpesvirus-68. Journal of virology, JVI-00307.
  • Kweon, S. M., Chen, Y., Moon, E., Kvederaviciutė, K., Klimasauskas, S., & Feldman, D. E. (2019). An Adversarial DNA N6-Methyladenine-Sensor Network Preserves Polycomb Silencing. Molecular Cellhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.018
  • Deng, F., He, S., Cui, S., Shi, Y., Tan, Y., Li, Z., ... & Peng, L. (2018). A Molecular Targeted Immunotherapeutic Strategy for Ulcerative Colitis via Dual-Targeting Nanoparticles Delivering miR-146b to Intestinal Macrophages. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.
  • Jo, S., Fonseca, T. L., Bocco, B. M. D. C., Fernandes, G. W., McAninch, E. A., Bolin, A. P., ... & Németh, D. (2018). Type 2 deiodinase polymorphism causes ER stress and hypothyroidism in the brain. The Journal of Clinical Investigation.
  • Langston, R. G., Rudenko, I. N., Kumaran, R., Hauser, D. N., Kaganovich, A., Ponce, L. B., ... & Beilina, A. (2018). Differences in Stability, Activity and Mutation Effects Between Human and Mouse Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2. Neurochemical research, 1-14.
  • Amara, N., Tholen, M., & Bogyo, M. (2018). Chemical tools for selective activity profiling of endogenously expressed MMP-14 in multicellular models. ACS Chemical Biology. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.8b00562.
  • Allocca, S., Ciano, M., Ciardulli, M. C., D’Ambrosio, C., Scaloni, A., Sarnataro, D., ... & Bonatti, S. (2018). An αB-Crystallin Peptide Rescues Compartmentalization and Trafficking Response to Cu Overload of ATP7B-H1069Q, the Most Frequent Cause of Wilson Disease in the Caucasian Population. International journal of molecular sciences, 19(7).
  • *Peng, L., Zhang, H., Hao, Y., Xu, F., Yang, J., Zhang, R., ... & Chen, C. (2016). Reprogramming macrophage orientation by microRNA 146b targeting transcription factor IRF5. EBioMedicine, 14, 83-96.

  • *Hu, J. K., Crampton, J. C., Locci, M., & Crotty, S. (2016). CRISPR-mediated Slamf1Δ/Δ Slamf5Δ/Δ Slamf6Δ/Δ triple gene disruption reveals NKT cell defects but not T follicular helper cell defects. PloS one, 11(5), e0156074.

  • *Besschetnova, T. Y., Ichimura, T., Katebi, N., Croix, B. S., Bonventre, J. V., & Olsen, B. R. (2015). Regulatory mechanisms of anthrax toxin receptor 1-dependent vascular and connective tissue homeostasis. Matrix Biology, 42, 56-73.

  • *McKenzie, C. W., Craige, B., Kroeger, T. V., Finn, R., Wyatt, T. A., Sisson, J. H., ... & Lee, L. (2015). CFAP54 is required for proper ciliary motility and assembly of the central pair apparatus in mice. Molecular biology of the cell, 26(18), 3140-3149.

  • *Bishop, K. A., Harrington, A., Kouranova, E., Weinstein, E. J., Rosen, C. J., Cui, X., & Liaw, L. (2016). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated insertion of loxP sites in the mouse Dock7 gene provides an effective alternative to use of targeted embryonic stem cells. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 6(7), 2051-2061.

For more journal references, please visit our comprehensive list of citations and reference publications.

Have Questions?

An Applied StemCell technical expert is happy to help, contact us today!